Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Acta odontol. Colomb. (En linea) ; 12(2): 12-25, Jul-Dec. 2022. tab, graf, graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1396352

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Determinar la equivalencia lingüística al español y la consistencia interna del Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry 99 (REALD-99) en población mexicana. Métodos: la equivalencia del REALD-99 se hizo mediante la metodología traducción-retraducción por expertos en la traducción de la lengua inglesa y se validó su contenido por parte de cinco odontólogos generales. El instrumento se aplicó a una muestra de 995 personas de 15 a 54 años que solicitaron atención odontológica por primera vez. La participación de los individuos fue voluntaria y el consentimiento se hizo por escrito. Se analizaron variables epidemiológicas y se determinó la consistencia interna del instrumento con la prueba del Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados: se identificaron dos palabras con traducción idéntica y tres sin aplicación en el contexto odontológico local. La edad promedio de los participantes fue de 30 años (DE ±11); el 62 % fueron mujeres. La aplicación del instrumento tuvo un promedio de 87 aciertos (DE ±9.2) con un tiempo promedio de aplicación de 2.24 minutos. El alfa de Cronbach fue de 0.91 con las 99 palabras. Conclusiones: el instrumento es intercambiable y equivalente con una consistencia interna similar al obtenido en otros países; sin embargo, los resultados son una aproximación a la habilidad de lectura, pues no garantiza la comprensión, conocimiento y la operatividad de todas las palabras; además, no explica las complejas habilidades involucradas en la alfabetización en salud.


Objective: To determine the linguistic equivalence in the Spanish language and the internal consistency of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry 99 (REALD-99) applied to a sample group of Mexican people. Method: The equivalence of the REALD-99 was performed by expert translators of the English language by means of translation-retranslation; its content was validated by fve bachelors of dentistry. The instrument was applied to a sample group of 995 people between 15 and 54 years old who requested dental care for the frst time. The people participated voluntarily, and their consent was given in writing. Epidemiological variables were analyzed, and the internal consistency of the instrument was determined with the Cronbach's Alpha test. Results: Two words with identical translation and three without application in the local dental context were identifed. The average age of the participants was 30 years old (SD ±11); 62% were women. The application of the instrument was 87 correct answers (SD ±9.2) on average and the application time was a median of 2.24 minutes. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 with the 99 words. Conclusions: The instrument is interchangeable and equivalent with an internal consistency similar to that obtained in other countries. However, the results are an approximation to the reading ability and do not guarantee the knowledge, comprehension, or operability of related vocabulary and neither they explain the complex skills involved in health literacy.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Dentistry , Linguistics
2.
J. Public Health Africa (Online) ; 13(2): 1-6, 2022. tables
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1395597

ABSTRACT

Senegal having a significant prevalence of socially differentiated oral diseases, oral health literacy (OHL), an individual and social resource, should be considered alongside a remedial response. This work aimed to analyze women's OHL characteristics. A cross-sectional study on 315 women in Pikine County was carried out, using the Oral Health Literacy-Adult Questionnaire (OHL-AQ) for the OHL data collection and a questionnaire for the women's socioeconomic characteristics data. These women had an OHL average score of 6.5±3.1 and a median of 6. Among them, 56.5% had a seemingly low OHL level, a little over 68.9% had a score above the median as regards the "listening, communication and understanding" aspect, 58.4% to "decision making", 55.2% to "understanding numbers" and 33% to "reading and understanding". According to a multivariate analysis, secondary and higher educated women (p<0.001) with an active social network (p<0.023), in a wealthy household (p<0.0001) and of nuclear household type (p<0.036) had a higher OHL level. Women in Pikine have low OHL and are from working- class households. Therefore, oral health policies must take into account the women's social network contribution to the OHL improvement.


Subject(s)
Humans , Oral Health , Health Literacy , Senegal , Women , Dentists, Women , Literacy
3.
Int. j. med. surg. sci. (Print) ; 5(1): 38-43, mar. 2018.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1281976

ABSTRACT

According to the World Health Organization, Health Literacy (HL) corresponds to the cognitive and social abilities that determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access, to understand, and to use information in ways that provide and maintain good health. The development of HL in dentistry came late, and only in the last decade did it reach a level similar to that in the medical area. In dentistry, HL centered on the concept of Oral Health Literacy (OHL), defined as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic information on oral health and services that is necessary to make appropriate health decisions. The evidence suggests that people with low HL have worse health status and greater use of medical resources, which results in an increase in costs in the general population. Determinants of the level of OHL include age, level of education, and socioeconomic level. These determinants are reflected in low oral health and in less access to information or less understanding regarding care, pathologies, or dental treatments. The instruments for measuring HL and OHL are mainly aimed at recognizing arithmetic and reading skills, which are not fully related to the ability of the people surveyed to find, understand and use information related to health. OHL is an important issue at the level of health programs, because knowledge of OHL helps in medical practice, in disease prevention and in health promotion. OHL instruments must have validated and demonstrate adequate psychometric properties.


Subject(s)
Humans , Oral Health , Health Literacy , Chile
4.
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health ; : 229-237, 2018.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-740584

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine oral health literacy in a sample of Korean of 5th and 6th grade elementary school children. METHODS: Data were obtained from a convenience sample of 274 5(th) and 6(th) grade children from two elementary schools located in Seoul and Uijeongbu. The oral health literacy assessment tool for children of Korea (OHLC-K) takes approximately 11 minutes to complete, and consists of 20 self-report questions with a score range of 0 to 20. Item analysis, descriptive statistics, correlation and multiple linear regression were performed using SPSS 23.0 and testAn 1.0. RESULTS: The lowest and highest percentage of correct answers were found in “Definition of periodontal disease (19.3%)” and “Definition of halitosis (92.7%),” respectively. The mean score for oral health literacy was found to be 14.95 ± 2.83, corresponding to a score of approximately 75% correct answers. The correlation coefficient for Korean and OHLC-K scores was high (r=.73, P < .01). In the multiple linear regression, oral health literacy was associated with grade and gender. CONCLUSION: The present findings revealed that a quarter of the subjects were likely to misunderstand oral health information. Oral health education is indispensable to all children and, therefore, it is necessary to pay greater attention to children who exhibit poor oral health literacy.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Education , Halitosis , Korea , Linear Models , Literacy , Oral Health , Periodontal Diseases , Seoul
5.
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health ; : 214-221, 2017.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-75044

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and appraise an oral health literacy assessment tool for upper elementary school students. METHODS: Twenty-eight preliminary assessment items were developed on the basis of various types of oral health education literature for children. They contained verbal and functional sections and they were classified into 2 cognitive processes (literal and inferential). The questionnaires were analyzed using the testAn v.1.0 program for identified Cronbach's α, item discrimination, and difficulty through classical test theory. A final evaluation tool was developed and selected by conducting three surveys and 20 items. RESULTS: The final survey was completed by 132 fifth and sixth grade elementary school students in Seoul. The Cronbach's α value, item discrimination, and difficulty were .71, .38, and .75, respectively. The mean score for oral health literacy of children was 14.9 (±3.2, theoretical range: 0-20, 75% correct answers). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that this tool could be relied on to help determine the level of oral health literacy in children and in preparing appropriate oral health education programs for children.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Discrimination, Psychological , Education , Literacy , Oral Health , Seoul
6.
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health ; : 102-109, 2017.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-194234

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We used a questionnaire to measure the oral health literacy of Korean adults. We then evaluated the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: This questionnaire was developed using a literacy assessment tool from the National Institute of Korean Language, Republic of Korea. The survey was composed of instructions for dental treatment and oral health information. The components were sub-classified into three cognitive processes (realistic, deductive, and critical domains). Of the 337 university students who received the questionnaire, 84.3 percent responded. We calculated the reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's α, to assess the item discrimination and difficulty as well as effectiveness of distracters. RESULTS: We found that the reliability of the 24 items in the questionnaire was 0.89. The mean item discrimination and difficulty values were 0.53 and 0.71. The percentage of correct answers was higher than the effectiveness of the distracters in all items. The mean number of answers to the oral health information data (72.1) was higher than that to dental treatment instructions (63.9). The mean number of answers to the items in the realistic domain (76.1) was higher than that to the items in the deductive (69.4) and critical (65.9) domains. Neither gender nor university major had a significant effect on the percentage of correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty percent of university students were found to have the government-recommended level of oral literacy. Therefore, better oral health education is required to ensure that all individuals meet government-recommended levels.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Discrimination, Psychological , Education , Literacy , Oral Health , Reproducibility of Results , Republic of Korea
7.
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health ; : 71-78, 2016.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-201072

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify the oral health literacy level of mothers in multi-cultural families and promote their oral health. METHODS: Participants were 46 mothers belonging to multi-cultural families who participated in the Oral health promotion program for multi-cultural families in Gangneung. For measurement of oral health literacy, 30 subjects were analyzed. Six pre-trained investigators conducted an interview with the mothers. Thirty-six mothers belonging to general families in Gangneung were included, and 30 subjects were analyzed. The Oral Health Literacy Instrument for Korean Children's Caregiver was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: The mean oral health literacy score for mothers from multi-cultural families was 10.83 out of 22.0, which was lower than the score for mothers from general families (P<0.05). The percentage of mothers from multi-cultural families whose oral health literacy was inadequate was 63.3%. Oral health literacy scores were significantly different by Korean fluency level (P<0.05). The correlation between Korean communication level and reading comprehension score was significant (P<0.01). The correlation between Korean communication level and total oral health literacy score was also significant (P<0.05). Finally, there was a significant correlation between oral health knowledge and reading comprehension (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The oral health literacy score for mothers from multi-cultural families was lower than that for mother belonging to general families, and 63.3% had inadequate knowledge. Oral health professionals should use easy terms and consider the Korean communication capacity of mothers in their professional service.


Subject(s)
Humans , Caregivers , Comprehension , Literacy , Mothers , Oral Health , Research Personnel
8.
Annals of Dentistry ; : 15-20, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-732017

ABSTRACT

Oral health literacy (OHL) is important in empowering people to improve their general and oral health.Carers’ OHL may be associated with their ability to deliver good oral healthcare to their children. The aimof this pilot study was to assess the OHL among carers of special needs children. This is a descriptivecross-sectional study of carers in four Community-Based Rehabilitation Centre. Data were collectedthrough a structured face-to-face interview of 40 carers. Oral Health Literacy Malay Version (OHLI-M)was measured using text passages and prompts with a total of 57 items. These items were used toassess comprehension and numerical ability of carers based on domains namely, accessing dental care,understand appointment and following medication instructions. The results showed that majority of theparticipants had ‘marginal’ and ‘adequate’ OHL level of 32.5% and 52.5%, respectively. Only four (10%)participants had ‘inadequate’ OHL level. The ‘reading comprehension’ and ‘numeracy’ sections’ meanscores were 37.54 (95% CI 35.7-39.4) and 38.17 (95% CI 34.8-41.6). The total OHL mean score was75.7 (95% CI 71.2-80.2). In conclusion, majority of the carers of special needs children in this sample hadmoderate OHL. Such information is important to develop more appropriate intervention programmes forcarers to match their OHL.

9.
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health ; : 237-244, 2015.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-86593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Oral health literacy is defined as 'the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic oral health information and services needed to make an appropriate health decision'. This goal of this study was to develop an instrument for assessing oral health literacy in Korean adults. METHODS: This instrument was developed by using the adult literacy evaluation tool of the Korean Government. The components were mainly related to 2 conditions ('oral health information' and 'dental treatment instruction'), and they were classified into 3 cognitive processes (realistic, deductive, and critical domains). Furthermore, all of the subcomponents were divided into prose and non-prose. Therefore, each of the 12 subcomponents had 4 items, resulting in a final questionnaire with 48 items. A pilot survey was conducted in 51 adults, and the quality of the questionnaire was subsequently evaluated. We identified reliability by using Cronbach's alpha, discrimination, and difficulty. Two items from each of the 12 subcomponents were selected as the final items. We set the difference thresholds at over 0.5 and over 0.3 for reliability and discrimination, respectively. Finally, we distributed the difficulty from 35 to 95%. RESULTS: The reliabilities of all items (48) and the final items (24) were 0.838 and 0.836, respectively. The mean discrimination of the final items was higher than that of all items (mean: 0.5 and 0.3, respectively). The difficulty curve of the final items followed a normal distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity demonstrated by the final 24 items indicates that they are appropriate for evaluating oral health literacy in adults.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Discrimination, Psychological , Oral Health , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL